‘FCA 2023 unconstitutional, undemocratic & unacceptable’

August 14, 2023 17 Views No Comment

DIMAPUR, AUGUST 14 (MExN): The four village councils of Sendenyu Rengma Naga tribe, namely Sendenyu, New Sendenyu, Thongsunyu and Lostuphen have unanimously condemned the recently passed Forest (Conservation) Amendment Act 2023.

A joint press release received from the four village council said the Act challenges the very essence of traditional customary and indigenous ownership-rights of the people over their land and forest as per the proviso of Article 371(A).

In 2001, as a response to a rapid decline of fauna and flora species in the region, the indigenous leaders and members of Sendenyu village (s) resolved to start community biodiversity conservation by unanimously passing The Sendenyu Village Wildlife Conservation Act 2001. Following this, people voluntarily donated their clan and private lands for community conservation to form a wildlife and biodiversity corridor of approx. 22 sq km (2200 hectares), which was resolved to be managed by Sendenyu Community Biodiversity and Wildlife Conservation Board.

As a result of the continued effort, Sendenyu Biodiversity Conservation has recorded an increase population of flora and fauna and has recorded newly discovered amphibian species i.e. Ichthyophis Sendenyu now listed in the IUCN Red List of Threatened Species.

Therefore, it resolved that given the manner in which the community have made great sacrifices and contributions to the ecological security and natural heritage and cultural identity of the land, the FCA 2023 is a direct act of discrimination and discouragement to the efforts of the true custodian of the forest-land as it will enable arbitrary diversion by the Central Government without obtaining prior consent from village councils and locale district authority.

As per the current amendment and provision of the Act, the whole of Nagaland and its forest falls under the 100- km of the international boundary giving the Central government arbitrary power for diversion, it stated.

It therefore appealed to all the Naga tribes’ village councils across the State to take this issue as a matter of great urgency and imminent crisis such that the Act could be rejected by the Nagaland Legislative Assembly, and the rights bestowed by our ancestors do not go in vain in the name of so-called national importance and security.

It further condemned the Act, while asserting that for such a major amendment no consultative process was undertaken to understand the nuances and intricacies of land rights and forest issues of the people in various parts of India and North East.

Without due process of consultation with all concerned stakeholders, such an amendment to an existing Act is unconstitutional, undemocratic and unacceptable, it pointed out.